United States media have hyped news not long ago, say is a marvelous genius child prodigy, has 5 finished secondary school, aged 6 to go to College. New York Times reporter on this a event for followed, results was surprised: this named Justin of small boy 3 aged Shi do of that intelligence tests he only completed has 13 a small item in the of 3 a, and left of full is its mother later filled Shang of; Justin also has never no participate in had SAT--United States in the students candidates University most main of comprehensive ability test, its mother to neighbor children of results took to scan Hou, for Shang has Justin of name; Justin in accept intelligence tests zhiqian a months around, its mother from library take back Stanford University published of Binet--Simon intelligence measurement table, let son to answers all back has down.
It turns out that the sensational news was a mother to son overnight processing of all the great sham, in exchange for his son \"Whizz-kid\" in the world, met her mother\'s vanity is perhaps the most important reason.
Not long ago, many media to reprint one of the 19 year old female student in China broke the Oxford message of the 800 year record of outstanding results, later confirmed to be \"fake news\". The news said, Chancellor of Oxford University awarded President, grant one being Oxford University second-year PhD, 19-year-old girl and 60,000 pounds of maximum scholarship award, the girls at school in 11 subjects all ranked first in the exam results, breaking the 800 years of history, University of Oxford. Clearly written on the nationality of the girl, she is from China.
Two \"fake news\", which is headed by a mother concocted out of, which is by far not yet surfaced of \"good thing\"--perhaps we concocted out of media. Perhaps the processing of the latter\'s \"good thing\" the aim is to improve our national pride and self-confidence, their motivations than before to \"noble\", but, if not be laid bare, and that its negative effects may be worse, some of our parents might mistake \"child prodigy\" and \"genius\" is really easy.
\"Child prodigy\" may not be how God really is. In fact, most of them just \"very clever at childhood\", that is, compared to other children, mature earlier. Our parents, not for their children\'s \"very clever at childhood\" complacent, not as a child could not be felt dejected because early resuscitation. Ordinary people, ordinary children, average IQ is always most. On the media, whether some of the less \"child prodigy\", \"genius\" in hot pursuit of it?
No comments:
Post a Comment